Antigravity Technology Secretly Developed in Covert Projects

Antigravity Technology Secretly Developed in Covert Projects

Aloha all, in this article we're analysing the development of 
antigravity technologies and how this has been secretly developed in 
covert projects and kept from the general public.

Historical Background

Townsend Brown's Technology of Electrogravitics  

      In the mid 1920's Townsend Brown discovered that electric 
charge and gravitational mass are coupled. He found that when he 
charged a capacitor to a high voltage, it had a tendency to move 
toward its positive pole. This became known as the Biefeld-Brown 
effect.  His findings were opposed by conventional minded physicists 
of his time.
BANNED 'ELECTRO-ANTI-GRAVITY' of T. T. Brown The Pearl Harbor Demonstration. Around 1953, Brown conducted a demonstration for military top brass. He flew a pair of 3-foot diameter discs around a 50-foot course tethered to a central pole. Energized with 150,000 volts and emitting ions from their leading edge, they attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The subject was thereafter classified.

The Pearl Harbor Demonstration. Around 1953, Brown conducted a  demonstration for military top brass. He flew a pair of 3-foot  diameter discs around a 50-foot course tethered to a central pole.  Energized with 150,000 volts and emitting ions from their leading  edge, they attained speeds of several hundred miles per hour. The  subject was thereafter classified.
Project Winterhaven. Brown submitted a proposal to the Pentagon for the development of a Mach 3 disc shaped electrogravitic fighter craft. Drawings of its basic design are shown in one of his patents. They are essentially large-scale versions of his tethered test discs.
Project Winterhaven.  Brown submitted a proposal to the  Pentagon for the development of a Mach 3 disc shaped electrogravitic  fighter craft.  Drawings of its basic design are shown in one of his  patents.  They are essentially large-scale versions of his tethered  test discs. Review of Issues From the 1950s Once Brown's findings became well known, some scientists began to openly speak about the flying technology of UFOs, which had been observed extensively since the 1940s. None other than Professor Hermann Oberth, considered by some to be one of the fathers of the space age, who later worked in the US with Wernher von Braun, the Army Ballistic Missile Agency and NASA, stated the following in 1954:
 Once Brown's findings became well known, some scientists began  to openly speak about the flying technology of UFOs, which had been  observed extensively since the 1940s. None other than Professor  Hermann Oberth, considered by some to be one of the fathers of the  space age, who later worked in the US with Wernher von Braun, the  Army Ballistic Missile Agency and NASA, stated the following in  1954:  "It is my thesis that flying saucers are real and that they are space ships from another solar system." Perhaps of more interest to our present discussion on propulsion, he then stated that: "They are flying by the means of artificial fields of gravity...; They produce high-tension electric charges in order to push the air out of their paths, so it does not start glowing, and strong magnetic fields to influence the ionized air at higher altitudes. First, this would explain their luminosity... Secondly, it would explain the noiselessness of UFO flight..." We now know that he was fundamentally correct in his assessment. In 1956, a British research company, Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. published a classified report on Electrogravitics Systems examining various aspects of gravity control. They summarized the pioneering work of Townsend Brown and then described the use of electrogravitic thrust as follows: "The essence of electrogravitics thrust is the use of a very strong positive charge on one side of the vehicle and a negative on the other. The core of the motor is a condenser and the ability of the condenser to hold its charge (the K-number) is the yardstick of performance. With air as 1, current dielectrical materials can yield 6 and use of barium aluminate can raise this considerably, barium titanium oxide (a baked ceramic) can offer 6,000 and there is a promise of 30,000, which would be sufficient for supersonic speed." [4] In one of their conclusions, based on Brown's work, they suggested that: "Electrostatic energy sufficient to produce a Mach 3 fighter is possible with megavolt energies and a k of over 10,000." [5] In spite of Brown's solid research, they later stated that, "One of the difficulties in 1954 and 1955 was to get aviation to take electrogravitics seriously. The name alone was enough to put people off." [6] It seems that is as true today as it was in the 1950s. A report by another British company, Gravity Rand, Ltd. in 1956, agrees with this assessment and states: "To assert electrogravitics is nonsense is as unreal as to say it is practically extant. Management should be careful of men in their employ with a closed mind or even partially closed mind on the subject." [7] However, a trade press magazine, The Aviation Report, made a numerous references to antigravity projects and listed many of the companies pursuing research in this area. Quotes from The Aviation Report listed in the Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. report [8] are suggestive of what was going on behind the scenes. In 1954 they predicted that: "... progress has been slow. But indications are now that the Pentagon is ready to sponsor a range of devices to help further knowledge."... "Tentative targets now being set anticipate that the first disk should be complete before 1960 and it would take the whole of the 'sixties to develop it properly, even though some combat things might be available ten years from now." (Aviation Report 12 October 1954) [9] During this time period many of the major defense and technology companies were cited as either having research projects or activities in this new field. For example: "Companies studying the implications of gravitics are said, in a new statement, to include Glenn Martin, Convair, Sperry-Rand, and Sikorsky, Bell, Lear Inc. and Clark Electronics. Other companies who have previously evinced interest include Lockheed, Douglas and Hiller." (Aviation Report 9 December 1955) [10]. Others of these reports mention: AT&T, General Electric, as well as Curtiss-Wright, Boeing and North American as having groups studying electrogravitics. During the same time period, the Gravity Rand report notes that: "Already companies are specializing in evolution of particular components of an electogravitics disk." [11] However, in the area of predictions, the Aviation Report stated the following based on an extrapolation of technology development: "Thus this century will be divided into two parts ^Ö almost to the day. The first half belonged to the Wright Brothers who foresaw nearly all the basic issues in which gravity was the bitter foe. In part of the second half, gravity will be the great provider. Electrical energy, rather irrelevant for propulsion in the first half becomes a kind of catalyst to motion in the second half of the century." (Aviation Report 7 September 1954). [12] Looking back it is easy to say that they missed the mark. Did they really miss it by a half a century? Reading through these reports it is quite obvious that there was much interest in antigravity among a number of very high profile companies, as well as in the Department of Defense. What happened to this interest and why was it all downplayed during the following four plus decades? After all, T. Brown had shown that there is a demonstrable connection between high voltage fields and gravity. Why has it taken until the 1990s for more than just a few scientists to look at these results and publish on them in the open literature? A review of recent statements by former military personnel and civilians connected to covert projects begins to shed light on research activity in these areas over the last half century. And it appears that there had been significant breakthroughs during this time period, well shielded from both the scientific and public eye. Recent Scientific Developments In this section we consider developments in the antigravity field since the late 1980s and why the confluence of scientific findings and the testimony of witnesses associated with the military and covert groups indicates that a gravity solution with technological implications has been found. Although general relativity has not been able to explain Brown's electrogravitic observations, or any other antigravity phenomenon, the recent physics methodology of quantum electrodynamics (QED), appears to offer the theoretical framework to explain electrogravitic coupling. Recent papers by members of the Institute for Advanced Study Alpha Foundation are putting a solid theoretical foundation onto the antigravity effects within the theory of electrodynamics and include papers by Evans [13] and Anastasozki et al. [14] Earlier in a breakthrough paper in 1994, Alcubierre showed that superluminal space travel is, in principle, physically possible and will not violate the tenants of the theory of relativity [15]. Puthoff [16] later analyzed these findings in light of the present SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) paradigms that insist that we could not be visited by extraterrestrial civilizations because of the speed-of-light limitations dictated by the general relativity theory. He suggests that super-luminal travel is indeed possible. This leads to reduced-time interstellar travel and the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation, which our limited understanding of physics and scientific arrogance has "forbidden" in some sectors for most of the 20th century. The second aspect of these physics findings deals with the zero point or vacuum state energy shown by the Casimir effect, which predicts that two metal plates close together attract each other due to imbalance in the quantum fluctuations. The implications of this zero point or vacuum state energy are tremendous and are described in several papers by Puthoff [17] starting during the late 1980s. A detailed bibliography on this and similar topics is available on the WWWeb. [18] Bearden [19] and colleagues have also written extensively on the theoretical physics of zero point energy and additionally have described various technological means of extracting this energy (for example see the recent paper by Anastasozki et al. [20]). A theoretical book on zero point energy by Bearden will soon be available. [21] There is significant evidence that scientists since Tesla have known about this energy, but that its existence and potential use has been discouraged and indeed suppressed over the past half century or more. [22] . The coupling of the electrogravitic phenomena observations and the zero point energy findings are leading to a new understanding of both the nature of matter and of gravity. This is just now being discussed in scientific journals (though some evidence suggests that it has been understood for decades within the black project covert community). The question that is being addressed is: what keeps the universe running? Or more specifically, where do electrons get their energy to keep spinning around atoms? As electrons change state they absorb or release energy, and where does it come from? The simplistic answer is that it is coming from the vacuum state. Puthoff [23] describes the process as follows: "I discovered that you can consider the electron as continually radiating away its energy as predicted by classical theory, but SIMULTANEOUSLY ABSORBING a COMPENSATING AMOUNT of energy from the ever-present sea of zero-point energy in which the atom is immersed. An equilibrium between these two processes leads to the correct values for the parameters that define the lowest energy, or ground-state orbit (see "Why atoms don't collapse," NEW SCIENTIST, July 1987). Thus there is a DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM in which the zero-point energy stabilizes the electron in a set ground-state orbit. It seems that the very stability of matter itself appears to depend on an underlying sea of electromagnetic zero-point energy." Furthermore, it appears that it is the spinning of electrons that provides inertia and mass to atoms. These theories, linking electron spin, zero point energy, mass, and inertia have been presented in a number of recent papers, such as those by Haisch [24] and colleagues and provide us with a possible explanation of the Biefield-Brown effect. It appears that an intense voltage field creates an electromagnetic barrier that blocks the atomic structure of an atom from interacting with the zero point field. This slows down the electrons, reducing their gyroscopic effect, and thus reducing atomic mass and inertia, making them easier to move around. Evidence of Extensive Antigravity Technology The B-2 Advanced Technology Bomber In 1993, LaViolette wrote a paper [25] discussing the B-2 bomber and speculating on its probable antigravity propulsion system, based on a solid understanding of electrogravitics, [26] the aircraft's design and the materials used in its manufacture. It appears that the craft is using a sophisticated form of the antigravity principles first described by T. Brown. Support for this thesis came from the Aviation Week and Space Technology (March 9, 1992), which reported that the B-2 bomber electrostatically charges its leading edge and its exhaust stream. Their information had come from a small group of former black project research scientists and engineers suggesting the B-2 utilizes antigravity technology. This information was supported by Bob Oechsler, an ex-NASA mission specialist who had publicly made a similar claim in 1990. These findings support the contention that there have been major developments in the area of antigravity propulsion which are presently being applied in advanced aircraft. LaViolette later states the obvious that "the commercial airline industry could dramatically benefit with this technology which would not only substantially increase the miles per gallon fuel efficiency of jet airliners, but would also permit high-speed flight that would dramatically cut flight time." [27] The Disclosure Project Witnesses On May 9, 2001 a private organization, "The Disclosure Project" [28] held a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington DC. They presented nearly two dozen witnesses including retired Army, Navy and Air Force personnel, a top FAA official, members of various intelligence organizations including the CIA and NRO, and industry personnel, all of whom who had witnessed UFO events or had inside knowledge of government or industrial activities in this area. They also produced a briefing document [29] for members of the press and Congress and a book [30] which includes the testimony of nearly 70 such witnesses from a pool of hundreds. Although they all spoke of the reality of the UFO phenomena, many also spoke of covert projects dealing with antigravity, zero point energy technologies and development of alien reproduction vehicles (ARVs) by US black project and covert interests. The following excerpted quotes from these witnesses support the above contentions. Dan Morris [31] is a retired Air Force career Master Sergeant who was involved in the extraterrestrial projects for many years. After leaving the Air Force, he was recruited into the super-secret National Reconnaissance Organization (NRO), during which time he worked specifically on extraterrestrial-connected operations. He had a cosmic top-secret clearance (38 levels above top secret) which, he states, no U.S. president, to his knowledge, has ever held. "UFOs are both extraterrestrial and man made. Well, the guys that were doing the UFOs, they weren't sleeping, and Townsend Brown was one of our guys who was almost up with the Germans. So we had a problem. We had to keep Townsend Brown - what he was doing on anti- gravity electromagnetic propulsion secret." He then describes a type of zero point energy device. "Well, if you have one of these units that's about sixteen inches long and about eight inches high and about ten inches wide, then you don't need to plug into the local electric company. These devices burn nothing. No pollution. It never wears out, because there are no moving parts. What moves are electrons, in the gravity field, in the electronic field, and they turn in opposite directions, okay?" "Dr. B." [32] (name withheld since he still works in this area) is a scientist and engineer who has worked on top-secret projects almost all his life. Over the years he has directly worked on or had involvement with such projects involving anti-gravity, chemical warfare, secure telemetry and communications, extremely high-energy space based laser systems, and electromagnetic pulse technology." "Anti-gravity. As a matter of fact, I used to go out to the Hughes in Malibu. They had a big think tank up there. Big anti- gravity projects; I used to talk to them out here. I'd give them ideas, because they bought all my equipment. But the American public will never, never hear about that." . . . "This flying disc has a little plutonium reactor in it, which creates electricity, which drives these anti-gravity plates. We also have the next level of propulsion, it is called virtual field, which are called hydrodynamic waves..." Captain Bill Uhouse [33] served 10 years in the Marine Corps as a fighter pilot, and four years with the Air Force at Wright- Patterson AFB as a civilian doing flight-testing of exotic experimental aircraft. Later, for the next 30 years, he worked for defense contractors as an engineer of antigravity propulsion systems: on flight simulators for exotic aircraft - and on actual flying discs. "I don't think any flying disc simulators went into operation until the early 1960s - around 1962 or 1963. The reason why I am saying this is because the simulator wasn't actually functional until around 1958. The simulator that they used was for the extraterrestrial craft they had, which is a 30-meter one that crashed in Kingman, Arizona, back in 1953 or 1952." "We operated it with six large capacitors that were charged with a million volts each, so there were six million volts in those capacitors."..."There weren't any windows. The only way we had any visibility at all was done with cameras or video-type devices."..."Over the last 40 years or so, not counting the simulators - I'm talking about actual craft - there are probably two or three-dozen, and various sizes that we built." "A.H." [34] formally of Boeing Aerospace, is a person who has gained significant information from inside the UFO extraterrestrial groups within our government, military, and civilian companies. He has friends at the NSA, CIA, NASA, JPL, ONI, NRO, Area 51, the Air Force, Northrup, Boeing, and others. "Most of the craft operate on antigravity and electrogravitic propulsion. We are just about at the conclusion state right now regarding antigravity. I would give it maybe about 15 years and we will have cars that will levitate using this type of technology. We're doing it up at Area 51 right now. That's some of the stuff that my buddy worked on up at Area 51 with Northrup, who lives now in Pahrump, Nevada. We're flying anti-gravity vehicles up there and in Utah right now..." Lieutenant Colonel Williams [35] entered the Air Force in 1964 and became a rescue helicopter pilot in Vietnam. He has an electrical engineering degree and was in charge of all the construction projects for the Military Air Command. During his time in the military he knew that there was a facility inside of Norton Air Force Base in California that no one was to know about. "There was one facility at Norton Air Force Base that was close hold - not even the wing commander there could know what was going on. During that time period it was always rumored by the pilots that that was a cover for in fact the location of one UFO craft." Note that all he knew was of the rumor, however, it is confirmed by the next testimony, which also confirms some of the comments made by Captain Uhouse. Mark McCandlish [36] is an accomplished aerospace illustrator and has worked for many of the top aerospace corporations in the United States. A colleague, with whom he studied, has been inside a facility at Norton Air Force Base, where he witnessed alien reproduction vehicles, or ARVs, that were fully operational and hovering. He states that the US not only has operational antigravity propulsion devices, but we have had them for many, many years, and they have been developed through the study, in part, of extraterrestrial vehicles over the past fifty years. A close friend, Brad Sorensen, told him of visiting The Big Hangar, during an air show at Norton Air Force Base on November 12, 1988 and how he had seen flying saucers in this hangar. "There were three flying saucers floating off the floor ^×no cables suspended from the ceiling holding them up, no landing gear underneath ^× just floating, hovering above the floor. He said that the smallest was somewhat bell-shaped. They were all identical in shape and proportion, except that there were three different sizes. They had little exhibits with a videotape running, showing the smallest of the three vehicles sitting out in the desert, presumably over a dry lakebed, some place like Area 51. It showed this vehicle making three little quick, hopping motions; then [it] accelerated straight up and out of sight, completely disappearing from view in just a couple of seconds ^× no sound, no sonic boom ^× nothing." "Well, this craft was what they called the Alien Reproduction Vehicle; it was also nicknamed the Flux Liner. This antigravity propulsion system ^× this flying saucer ^× was one of three that were in this hangar at Norton Air Force Base. [Its] synthetic vision system [used] the same kind of technology as the gun slaving system they have in the Apache helicopter: if [the pilot] wants to look behind him, he can pick a view in that direction, and the cameras slew in pairs. [The pilot] has a little screen in front of his helmet, and it gives him an alternating view. He [also] has a little set of glasses that he wears ^× in fact, you can actually buy a 3-D viewing system for your video camera now that does this same thing ^× so when he looks around, he has a perfect 3-D view of the outside, but no windows. So, why do they have no windows? Well, it's probably because the voltages that we're talking about [being] used in this system were probably something between, say, half a million and a million volts of electricity." Brad Sorensen stated that at the ARV display, "a three star general said that these vehicles were capable of doing light speed or better." All of these witness testimonies do not prove the existence of a successful US covert program in antigravity technologies. Only the demonstration of such craft coupled with the accompanying government and technical specification documents would `prove' this. However, these testimonies coupled with information from other substantial sources such as Nick Cook's new book mentioned below, strongly supports this contention. The Hunt for Zero Point [37] Although this very recent book (August, 2001) is not yet available in the US, it contains some of the strongest evidence yet for major efforts and success in the field of antigravity technology. The author, Nick Cook, who for the past 15 years has been the Aviation Editor and Aerospace Consultant for Jane's Defense Weekly, spent the last 10 years collecting information for the book. This included archival research on Nazi Germany's antigravity technology and interviews with top officials at NASA, the Pentagon and secret defense installations. He shows that America has cracked the gravity code and classified the information at the highest security levels. Because antigravity and its allied zero point energy technologies potentially offer the world a future of unlimited, non-polluting energy it has been suppressed because of the "huge economic threat". His findings support those reported by many of the Disclosure Project witnesses cited above. Antigravity Technology Demonstrations Although T. Brown reported many of his findings nearly a half century ago, other experimenters have just recently begun to reproduce his work and report it in the open literature and on the WWWeb. For example, Davenport [38] published the results of his work in 1995 supporting the findings of T. Brown. More recently, Transdimensional Technologies [39] in the USA and J. Naudin [40] labs in France have posted on the WWWeb: diagrams, web videos, and data on their versions of antigravity "Lifters" based on an extension of Brown's work. It is a sad commentary on this whole area of research to see that public science is requiring us to demonstrate principles that were demonstrated nearly fifty years ago. There have also been a number of other demonstrations of "antigravity" phenomena by researchers throughout the world. This includes the work of Brazilian physics professor, Fran De Aquino, and such devices as: the Searl Electrogravity Disc, the Podkletnov Gravity Shield and Project Greenglow, the Zinsser Kineto-baric Field Propulsion and the Woodward Field Thrust Experiments on Piezoelectrics. All of these are described in more detail by Greer and Loder. [41] Implications of This Research Antigravity and zero point energy research and their applications are finally being addressed by some of the open scientific community. This means there will have to be a rewriting of textbooks in this area so our new generation of students can apply this "new knowledge." Its application will lead to major breakthroughs in transportation technologies both earthside and in outer space. The implications are that we have the potential for human exploration of our solar system and beyond, if we have the will, within our lifetimes. It also means that the majority of 20th century space technology will be obsolete and in fact may already be so. The zero point or vacuum state energy source is seen as a totally non-polluting energy source, which has the potential to replace all the fossil fuels on this planet. It also will provide the energy needed for long range space flights. This means that fuel cells and solar cells in common use today for space flight energy applications will only be needed until we transition to these new energy technologies. Based on an analysis of trends in antigravity research over the last half-century and the information provided by numerous witnesses, it appears that there is both good and bad news. The good news is that it appears that we (at least covert projects) have already developed the theories of antigravity, and additionally have developed working spacecraft based on these principles. The bad news is that these technologies have been developed for at least several decades, at the public's expense and that human kind has been deprived of these technologies, while continuing to waste energy using less efficient and pollution enhancing technologies. Supporting this contention is the following quote from Ben Rich, former head of the Lockheed Skunkworks. Just prior to his death, he stated to a small group after a lecture that: "We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity..." He further went on to say that, `anything you can imagine we already know how to do.' Strong words from a knowledgeable deep insider and words that support what a number of the witnesses stated as well. As the reality of this knowledge begins to be understood, there will be an outcry among space scientists not on the inside for release of these technologies to allow all of us to explore space. There will be major changes in the way that NASA does its business, though predicting these changes is difficult. Not only has space exploration in the public sector suffered, but our planet's environment has suffered as well. Thus as this knowledge begins to sink in there will be an outcry among all concerned citizens on this planet for release of these technologies to allow all of us to reduce and ultimately eliminate global warming and environmental pollution that so threatens our way of life. These technologies will not only affect space travel technologies, but will also have a profound effect on transportation and energy production on the Earth's surface. In conclusion, we might consider the observation made by Halton Arp [42]: "We are certainly not at the end of science. Most probably we are just at the beginning!" Acknowledgements I thank the following people for many discussions while preparing and writing this paper including: S. Greer, A. Craddock, T. Bearden, P. LaViolette, M. McCandlish, D. Hamilton, T. Valone, E. Mallove, T. Loder, C. Loder, S. Patel and many of the courageous Disclosure Project witnesses. References Cited [1] Copyright © 2002 by Theodore C. Loder. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. with permission. Presented at the 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno NV. Paper number AIAA-2002-1131. [1] Quoted from: LaViolette, P. A. 2000. Moving Beyond the First Law and Advanced Field Propulsion Technologies. In T. Loder (ed.), "Outside-the-Box" Technologies, Their Critical Role Concerning Environmental Trends, and the Unnecessary Energy Crisis. Report prepared for The U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Comm. [2] Brown, T. T. 1929. How I control gravity. Science and Information Magazine, Aug. 1929. Reprinted in Psychic Observer 37 (1): 66-67. [3] Oberth, Hermann: "Flying Saucers Come from a Distant World," The American Weekly, October 24, 1954. [4] Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956. Electro-gravitics Systems: An examination of electrostatic motion, dynamic counterbary and barycentric control. p. 14. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005. [5] Ibid. p. 27. [6] Ibid. p. 19. [7] Gravity Rand Ltd. 1956. The Gravitics Situation. p. 54. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005. [8] Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956. Electrogravitics Systems: An examination of electrostatic motion, dynamic counterbary and barycentric control. p. 11. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005. [9] Ibid. p. 34. [10] Ibid p. 41. [11] Gravity Rand Ltd. 1956. The Gravitics Situation. p. 47. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005. [12] Aviation Studies (International) Ltd. 1956. Electrogravitics Systems: An examination of electrostatic motion, dynamic counterbary and barycentric control. p. 32. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005. [13] Evans, M. W. 2002. The link between the Sachs and O(3) theories of electrodynamics. In Evans, M.W. (ed.), Modern Nonlinear Physics, Pun 2. 2nd ed., Advances in Chemical Physics 19:469-494. [14] Anastasovski, P.K., T.E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W.T. Coffey, L.B. Crowell, G.J. Evans, M.W. Evans, R. Flower, A. Labounsky, B. Lehnert, M. Mészáros, P.R. Molnár, S. Roy, and J.-P. Vigier. In Press). Antigravity effects in the Sachs theory of electrodynamics Foundations of Physics Letters. [15] Alcubierre, M. 1994. The Warp Drive: Hyper-fast travel within general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11, L73. [16] Puthoff, H. E. 1996. SETI, The Velocity-of-Light Limitation, and the Alcubierre Warp Drive: An Integrating Overview, Physics Essays 9:156. [17] Puthoff, H. 1989. Gravity as a Zero-Point Fluctuation Force." Phys. Rev A., 39(5):2333-2342. Puthoff, H. 1989. Source of Electromagnetic Zero-Point Energy." Phys. Rev A, 40(9):4597-4862. [18] www.motionsciences.com [19] See the Tom Bearden web site for an extensive listing and copies of his papers at: www.cheniere.org. [20] Anastasovski, P.K., T.E. Bearden, C. Ciubotariu, W.T. Coffey, L.B. Crowell, G.J. Evans, M.W. Evans, R. Flower, A. Labounsky, B. Lehnert, M. Mészáros, P.R. Molnár, J.K. Moscicki, S. Roy, and J.P. Vigier. 2001. Explanation of the motionless electromagnetic generator with 0(3) Electrodynamics. Foundations of Physics Letters, 14(1):87-93. [21] Bearden, T. 2002. Energy from the Vacuum: Concepts and Principles. World Scientific (In Press). [22] Valone, T. 2000. The Right Time to Develop Future Energy Technologies. in T. Loder (ed.). "Outside-the-Box" Technologies, Their Critical Role Concerning Environmental Trends, and the Unnecessary Energy Crisis. Report prepared for The U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Comm. [23] Puthoff, H. 1990. Everything for Nothing. New Scientist, 28 July 1990, pp. 52-55. [24] Haisch, B., Rueda, A. and Puthoff, H. 1994. Beyond E =mc2 ; A First Glimpse of a Postmodern Physics, in which Mass, Inertia and Gravity Arise from Underlying Electromagnetic Processes. The Sciences, 34:26. Haisch, B., Rueda, A., and Puthoff, H. 1997. Physics of the Zero- Point Field: Implications for Inertia, Gravitation and Mass. Speculations in Science and Technology, 20:99. Haisch, B. and Rueda, A. 1998. An Electromagnetic Basis for Inertia and Gravitation: What Are the Implications for 21st Century Physics and Technology? in El-Genk, M. S. (ed.), Space Technology and Applications International Forum-1998, DOE CNF-980103, CP420, p. 1443. Haisch, B. and Rueda, A. 1999. The Zero-Point Field and the NASA Challenge to Create the Space Drive. Proc. NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Workshop, NASA/CP-1999-208694, p. 55. [25] LaViolette, P. 1993. The U.S. Antigravity Squadron p. 82-101. In Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005, p. 82-101. [26] LaViolette, P. A. 1992. Electrogravitics: Back to the future. Electric Spacecraft, Issue 4, pp. 23-28. LaViolette, P. A. 1993. A theory of electrogravitics. Electric Spacecraft, Issue 8, pp. 33-36 [27] LaViolette, P. A. 2000. Moving Beyond the First Law and Advanced Field Propulsion Technologies. in T. Loder (ed.). "Outside- the-Box" Technologies, Their Critical Role Concerning Environmental Trends, and the Unnecessary Energy Crisis. Report prepared for The U.S. Senate Environment and Public Works Comm. [28] Information available at: www.disclosureproject.org. [29] Greer, S.M. and T.C. Loder III. 2001. Disclosure Project Briefing Document, 492 pp. Available on CD from: The Disclosure Project, P.O. Box 265, Crozet, VA 22932. Also available from: www.disclosureproject.org. [30] Greer, S. M. 2001. Disclosure: Military and government witnesses reveal the greatest secrets in modern history. Crossing Point, Inc. Crozet, VA, 573 pp. [31] Ibid. pp. 357-366. [32] Ibid. pp. 262-270. [33] Ibid. pp. 384-387. [34] Ibid. pp. 391-403. [35] Ibid. pp. 388-389. [36] Ibid. pp. 497-510. [37] Cook, N. 2001. The Hunt for Zero Point. Available from: www.amazon.co.uk. [38] Deavenport, L. 1995. "T.T. Brown Experiment replicated". Electric Spacecraft Journal. Issue 16. Oct. 1995. (Reprinted in: Valone, T. (ed.), 1994. Electro-gravitics Systems: Reports on a new propulsion methodology. Integrity Research Institute, Washington, DC 20005 [39] Transdimensional Technologies, 906-E Bob Wallace, Ave., Huntsville, AL 35801. [40] http://jnaudin.free.fr [41] Greer, S.M. and T.C. Loder III. 2001. Disclosure Project Briefing Document, 492 pp. Available on CD from: The Disclosure Project, P.O. Box 265, Crozet, VA 22932. Also available from: www.disclosureproject.org. [42] Arp, H. 1998. Seeing Red: Redshifts, Cosmology and Academic Science. Montreal, Aperion. (p. 249). ################################################################ IUFO: Excerpt from "The U.S. Antigravity Squadron" Excerpt from "The U.S. Antigravity Squadron" BY PAUL A. LAVIOLETTE, PH.D. The U.S.Antigravity Squadron Excerpt from "The U.S. Antigravity Squadron" by Paul A. LaViolette, Ph.D. An excerpt from a paper by Paul A. LaViolette, Ph.D. entitled "The U.S. Antigravity Squadron" has been reprinted below with permission of the author. Earlier we had mistakenly posted the entire paper not realizing that it is copyrighted and appears in the book "Electrogravitics Systems: Reports on a New Propulsion Methodology" edited by T. Valone (Washington, D.C.: Integrity Research Institute, 1994); ISBN 0-9641070-0-7. If you had downloaded that paper, be aware of its copyrighted status. Please erase the paper from your computers and do not pass on that information. Note that the published paper contains 9 very informative diagrams which illustrate its main points. The book, which also contains other interesting papers, may be ordered from the following websites: Website 1 Website 2 Or by calling the following toll free number: 1-800-715-9993. The book may be purchased for $15 plus $4 S/H. In addition to "The U.S. Antigravity Squadron" paper, the book also includes the following: 1. The 1956 intelligence paper "Electrogravitics Systems" (prepared by the Special Weapons Study Unit of Aviation Studies Ltd., a UK-based aviation industry intelligence firm). It was declassified from a confidential status some time prior to 1985 and entered the public domain as a result of an interlibrary loan request placed through the Wright-Patterson Air Force Base Technical Library by Dr. LaViolette. 2. The 1956 paper "The Gravitics Situation" (prepared by Gravity Rand Ltd., a division of Aviation Studies Ltd. This includes six appendices with papers by various authors including the text from T. Townsend Brown's 1928 gravitor patent. 3. A paper by Banesh Hoffman entitled "Negative Mass as a Gravitational Source of Energy in the Quasistellar Radio Sources. 4. A collection of diagrams reproduced from various patents by Townsend Brown. Also available via the above toll free numbers, and for the same price of $15 plus $4 S/H, is the book "Subquantum Kinetics: A Systems Approach to Physics and Cosmology" (ISBN 0-9642025-5-7). This book contains a full chapter that gives some background information on Townsend Brown's electrogravitics experiments. Subquantum kinetics is a new approach to microphysical theory that utilizes concepts from the fields of nonlinear chemical kinetics, irreversible thermodynamics, and general system theory, replacing the current mechanistic foundation of physics with a reaction-kinetic model. This new approach resolves a number of problems that plague classical and modern physics also may provide some insights into the electrogravitic connection that Brown was researching. Electrogravitic (antigravity) technology, under development in U.S. Air Force black R&D programs since late 1954, may now have been put to practical use in the B-2 Advanced Technology Bomber to provide an exotic auxiliary mode of propulsion. This inference is based on the recent disclosure that the B-2 charges both its wing leading edge and jet exhaust stream to a high voltage. Positive ions emitted from its wing leading edge would produce a positively charged parabolic ion sheath ahead of the craft while negative ions injected into it's exhaust stream would set up a trailing negative space charge with a potential difference in excess of 15 million volts. According to electrogravitic research carried out by physicist T. Townsend Brown, such a differential space charge would set up an artificial gravity field that would induce a reactionless force on the aircraft in the direction of the positive pole. An electrogravitic drive of this sort could allow the B-2 to function with over-unity propulsion efficiency when cruising at supersonic velocities. For many years rumors circulated that the U.S. was secretly developing a highly advanced, radar-evading aircraft. Rumor turned to reality in November of 1988, when the Air Force unveiled the B-2 Advanced Technology Bomber. Although military spokesmen provided the news media with some information about the craft's outward design, and low radar and infrared profile, there was much they were silent about. However, several years later, some key secrets about the B-2 were leaked to the press. On March 9, 1992, "Aviation Week and Space Technology" magazine made a surprising disclosure that the B-2 electrostatically charges its exhaust stream and the leading edges of its wing-like body.(1) Those familiar with the electrogravitics research of American physicist T. Townsend Brown will quickly realize that this is tantamount to stating that the B-2 is able to function as an antigravity aircraft. "Aviation Week" obtained their information about the B-2 from a small group of renegade west coast scientists and engineers who were formerly associated with black research projects. In making these disclosures, these scientists broke a code of silence that rivals the Mafia's. They took the risk because they felt that it was important for economic reasons that efforts be made to declassify certain black technologies for commercial use. Two of these individuals said that their civil rights had been blatantly abused (in the name of security) either to keep them quiet or to prevent them from leaving the tightly controlled black R&D community. Several months after "Aviation Week" published the article, black world security personnel went into high gear. That sector of the black R&D community received VERY STRONG warnings and, as a result, the group of scientists subsequently broke off contact with the magazine. Clearly, the overseers of black R&D programs were substantially concerned about the information leaks that had come out in that article. To completely understand the significance of what was said about the B-2, one must first become familiar with Brown's work. Beginning in the mid 1920's, Townsend Brown discovered that it is possible to create an artificial gravity field by charging an electrical capacitor to a high-voltage.(2) He specially built a capacitor which utilized a heavy, high charge-accumulating (high K-factor) dielectric material between its plates and found that when charges with between 70,000 to 300,000 volts, it would move in the direction of its positive pole. When oriented with its positive side up, it would proceed to lose about 1 percent of it's weight.(3, 4) He attributed this motion to an electrostatically- induced gravity field acting between the capacitor's oppositely charged plates. By 1958, he had succeeded in developing a 15 inch diameter model saucer that could lift over 110% of its weight!(5) Brown's experiments had launched a new field of investigation which came to be known as electrogravitics, the technology of controlling gravity through the use of high-voltage electric charge. To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed. If you have any questions about this, please check out our Copyright Policy. To the best of our knowledge, the text on this page may be freely reproduced and distributed. If you have any questions about this, please check out our Copyright Policy. [secure2.gif] totse.com certificate signatures ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Classified Advanced Antigravity Aerospace Craft Utilizing Back-engineered Extraterrestrial Technology by Richard Boylan, Ph.D. © 2005 As a behavioral scientist and clinician, I have been working for over 15 years with persons who report having had an encounter with an extraterrestrial intelligent life form, a Star Visitor. During the course of this work I have felt it necessary to learn as much as possible about the veridical reality of UFOs, and what the government already knows about these visitors from afar. As information on Star Visitors and their encounters with humans piled up, I began to publish my findings, presenting them at national and international conferences, in specialty journals, and in media interviews. This in turn brought me to the attention of certain figures, currently or formerly in highly-classified sectors of government and the military ad intelligence agencies. These individuals decided to leak certain additional information to me, knowing that I would thus serve as a conduit to bring such leaked information to the attention of the portion of the public interested and ready for such information. My doctoral training in psychology and anthropology taught the value of first-hand field research. And because the existence and operations of various undeclared or secret government installations related to Star Visitor matters are not going to be plumbed without field research, I made it my task, starting in 1992, to reconnoiter, observe, and in some instances penetrate many of the most important of these installations. I reasoned that the knowledge I gained could be very helpful to the experiencers who consult with me, to help them feel secure that they had not hallucinated, but that such advanced technology exists, and in fact, the American government is in possession of some of this technology. Additionally, the hundreds of experiencers of encounters shared with me information they possessed, including about advanced U.S. craft, either by reason of being told such things by the Star Visitors, or by being kidnaped by rogue military-intelligence units and taken aboard one of these craft to one or other of these installations, or viewed such craft once they arrived. This added to my store of information and data on advanced U.S. antigravity craft. While I have gathered, or been entrusted by others with, considerable information on special American aerospace craft, I do not purport to know everything that is in the U.S. arsenal, nor everything about the operations and capabilities of the craft that I am about to identify. What I know is presented here. I have held nothing back. At this time, I am aware of the existence of ten kinds of special- technology advanced aerospace platforms [mil-speak for craft], all incorporating antigravity technology in some form. These ten are: the Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit Stealth Bomber, the Aurora, Lockheed-Martin's X-33A, Boeing and Airbus Industries' Nautilus, the TR3-A Pumpkinseed , the TR3-B Triangle , Northrop's Great Pumpkin disc, Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical's XH-75D Shark antigravity helicopter, and Lockheed-Martin and Northrop's jointly- developed TAW-50 hypersonic antigravity fighter-bomber. Before we examine these ten exotic aerospace craft, a brief overview of the different forms of generating antigravity fields is in order. The most primitive antigravity technology is electrogravitic. This involves using voltages in the millions of volts to disrupt the ambient gravitational field. This results in an 89% reduction in gravity's hold on airframes in such vehicles as the B-2 Stealth Bomber and the TR3-B Triangle craft. And given the considerable ambient ionization field I observed around the X-22A, it is reasonable to assume that extreme-voltage electrogravitics is also employed with these craft. The next level up of sophistication is magnetogravitic. This involves generating high-energy toroidal fields spun at incredible rpm's, which also disrupts the ambient gravitational field, indeed to the extent that a counterforce to Earth's gravitational pull is generated . The early British aeronautical engineers called this dynamic counterbary . This may have been used in some earlier American saucers and prototypes, but I have only been told that the secret Nautilus spacefaring craft uses magnetic pulsing , which appears to utilize this technology. The third level of sophistication, that used in the more modern American antigravity craft, is direct generation and harnessing of the gravitational strong force. Such a strong-force field extends slightly beyond the atomic nucleus of Element 115, an exotic element donated by Star Visitor scientist-consultants to human scientists at S-4, a secret base south of Area 51. By amplifying that exposed gravitational strong force, and using antimatter reactor high energy, and then directing it, it is possible to lift a craft from the Earth and then change directions by vectoring the shaped antigravity force field thus generated. Important information about this third technology is available on Bob Lazar's website. (1.) This information is also described on the Bob Lazar video. Lazar worked on extraterrestrial technology at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Area 51's Site S-4. (2.) Let us now examine these 10 advanced craft in more detail. The amount of information available for each varies; in some cases more is known, in other cases very little. 1) The B-2 Stealth bomber is manufactured Northrop-Grumman. The Air Force describes it as a low-observable strategic, long-range heavy bomber capable of penetrating sophisticated and dense air-defense shields. Retired Air Force Colonel Donald Ware passed on to me information from a three-star general he knows, who revealed to him in July that the B-2 [Stealth bombers] have electro-gravitic systems on board; and that this explains why our 21 Northrop B-2s cost about a billion dollars each. (3.) 2) The Aurora SR-33A is a moderate-sized spacefaring vehicle. The late National Security Council scientist Dr. Michael Wolf (4.) of NSC's unacknowledged Special Studies Group subcommittee, (formerly called MJ-12), has stated that the Aurora can operate on both conventional fuel and antigravity field propulsion systems. He further stated that the Aurora can travel to the Moon. Wolf had also disclosed to me that the U.S. has a small station on the Moon, and a tiny observation post on Mars (5). Thus I doubt that Dr. Wolf would characterize the Aurora thus, unless it was a vessel already used in making such trips. He disclosed additionally that the Aurora operates out of Area 51, (Groom Dry Lake Air Force Station), at the northeast corner of the Nellis AFB Range, north of Las Vegas, Nevada. 3) The Lockheed-Martin X-33A military spaceplane is a prototype of Lockheed's other spaceplane, the single-stage-to-orbit reuseable aerospace vehicle, the National SpacePlane . Lockheed-Martin does not say too much about its winged, delta-shape X-33 VentureStar, except to say that we are building it. To be at that stage of development for its public-program SpacePlane, clearly Lockheed- Martin has already long since built prototypes, as well as an unacknowledged military version, which I have dubbed the X-33A. The A suffix stands for antigravity. Colonel Donald Ware, USAF (ret.) told me that he had recently learned from a three-star General that the VentureStar X-33 has electrogravitics (antigravity) system on board (6.). This virtually assures that the unacknowledged military antigravity version, the X- 33 A, must surely also have electrogravitics on board. It is possible that what I have called the X-33A is the Aurora craft which Dr. Wolf described. 4) the Lockheed X-22A is a two-man antigravity disc fighter. The late Colonel Steve Wilson, USAF (ret.), stated that military astronauts trained at a secret aerospace academy separate from the regular Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs, CO. These military astronauts then operate out of Beale and Vandenberg Air Force Bases, Northern California From those bases, these military astronauts regularly fly trans-atmospherically and out into space (7.). One of the aerospace craft they use, Colonel Wilson reported, is the X-22A. Another informant, Z , aka Jesse , who formerly worked at the NSA told me that the Lockheed X-22A antigravity fighter disc fleet is equipped with Neutral Particle Beam directed-energy weapons, that it is capable of effecting optical as well as radar invisibility, and that it is deployable for worldwide military operations from the new U.S. Space Warfare Headquarters, located in hardened underground facilities beneath 13,528' King's Peak in the Wasatch Mountains' High Uintas Primitive (Wilderness) Area, 80 miles east of Salt Lake City (8). Recently I also heard from an Army engineer, formerly TDY'ed to NASA, who shall remain unnamed at his request. He also confirmed that Lockheed had made the X-22A, the two-man antigravity fighter disc which I had seen test-flown in a canyon adjacent to the main Area 51 operations zone. He explained why I had seen the X-22A so nervously flown during that test flight. He said that the original X- 22A had had a standard altimeter hard-wired into it, but that such an instrument would give faulty readings in the craft's antigravity field, which bends space-time. He had recommended that they instead use a gradiometer, which would function better. Apparently his suggestion was finally taken up, since in more recent years I have seen the X-22As flying more smoothly and confidently at high altitudes over and near Area 51. Another informant who wishes his identity kept private related operational details about military deployment of antigravity disc craft which sound like the X-22A. He reports: During operation Desert Storm a close relative of mine was in charge of a Marine Division right on the front. In the first days film footage and especially video-cams which a large number of G.I.s had were impounded, so they wouldn`t capture any sensitive material. Iraq was pumped up and Gung-Ho, since they had well over 50,000 troops ready to charge us, [and] since we only had about 3500 they knew of, and they knew [that], because of the close proximity of troops we couldn`t nuke them, so, they were assuming piece of cake . Wrong. Two pictures my relative confiscated from one of his officers showed: 1. a large disc-shaped craft slightly in front of our men with a high intensity beam of light emitting out of it; then, 2. where men, equipment, etc. was [had stood], there only remained dark charcoal-like spots on the desert floor. We have had this technology for quite a while. The described disc was clearly an antigravity levitating aerial weapons platform in the U.S. arsenal. Quite possibly it was the Lockheed X-22A two-man discoid craft, the real DarkStar, of which the unmanned drone X-22 DarkStar is a aircraft cover program to disguise the existence of this manned antigravity fighter disc, the X-22A. Further, as Z noted, the real manned discs come equipped with the latest Neutral Particle Beam weapons, which take apart the target at the molecular level. Star Visitor craft do not incinerate humans. Only human military fighters are so deployed. So the above report does not deal with any extraterrestrial event. 5) The Nautilus is another space- faring craft, a secret military spacecraft which operates by magnetic pulsing (9.). It operates out of the unacknowledged new headquarters of the U.S. Space Command, deep under a mountain in Utah. It makes twice-a-week trips up to the secret military-intelligence space station, which has been in deep space for the past thirty years, and manned by U.S. and USSR (now CIS) military astronauts. The Nautilus also is used for superfast surveillance operations, utilizing its ability to penetrate target country airspace from above from deep space, a direction not usually expected. It is manufactured jointly by Boeing's Phantom Works near Seattle and EU's Airbus Industries Anglo-French consortium. During travel to Washington State several years ago, I had a conversation with a former Boeing executive who worked in their Phantom Works, Boeing's black projects division, (roughly the equivalent of Lockheed's Skunk Works). The executive confirmed what I had earlier learned from an intelligence insider: that Boeing had teamed up with Europe's Airbus Industrie to manufacture the Nautilus. 6) The TR3-A Pumpkinseed is a super-fast air vehicle. The Pumpkinseed nickname is a reference to its thin oval airframe, whose contours resemble that seed.. It may be the craft identified as using pulse detonation technology for propulsion in a sub- hypersonic regime, and also uses antigravity technology for either mass-reduction or complementary field propulsion at higher speed levels. As air breathers, these Pulse Detonation Wave Engines (PDWEs) could theoretically propel a hypersonic aircraft towards Mach 10 at an altitude in excess of 180,000 feet. Used to power an trans-atmospheric vehicle, the same PDWEs might be capable of lifting the craft to the edge of space when switched to rocket mode. 7) the TR3-B Triangle, The Astra , is a large triangular anti- gravity craft within the U.S. fleet.. Black projects defense industry insider Edgar Rothschild Fouche wrote about the existence of the TR3-B in his book, Alien Rapture (10.). My ex-NSA informant, Z , also confirmed the TR3-B is operational. Z had this to say about the TR3-B triangular antigravity craft. TR3-B. This is the code name for what everyone on Earth has seen. It is a very large triangular-shaped re-entry vehicle with anti- gravity. It is what the November [2000] issue of Popular Mechanics identified as the Lenticular Reentry Vehicle, a nuclear-powered flying saucer, the first version of which went operational in 1962, [the version Popular Mechanics illustrated.] It was used in Gulf War's early hours with electromagnetic- pulse/laser cannons. It literally sat mid-air, firing long-, medium- , short-range to take out antennas, towers, communications, air traffic control towers, TV dishes and centers, etc. For three hours, these three triangles [TR3-Bs] just sat there blowing up everything in sight. Then the Stealth fighters had fun for the rest of the day into the early evening next night. Then [followed] carpet bombings from high altitude B-52 Strato-Fortresses. They dumped all the old, aged Vietnam-era crap {munitions]; a third blew up and the rest [were] duds. Anyways, the TR3B has been in testing since the '60s. But it has only been perfected for the last 8 years [since 1992]. It is a good remake of what Truman first saw, [the Roswell semi- circular craft]. It is compartmentalized, built by the Skunk Works {Lockheed-Martin's classified plant at Palmdale, CA) and Boeing [Phantom Works, Seattle]. It is housed in Utah. Z was reminding of his earlier revelation that the U.S. Space Command has located its prime headquarters and antigravity space-launch fleet facility beneath King Mountain, the tallest mountain in the Wasatch Range east of Salt Lake City, Utah. 8) Northrop Aircraft Corporation has manufactured its Northrop antigravity disc, (designation unknown), which I have dubbed the Great Pumpkin , from its brilliant ruddy golden-orangish glow. I first saw these craft operationally test-flown in 1992 above the Groom Range ridge line at Area 51, Nevada. Later I saw the same intensely burning-bright orange-gold craft that I had seen above Areas 51 being test-flown sixty miles north of Los Angeles, in the Tehachapi Mountains east of Edwards Air Force Base. There the Northrop has its secret saucer manufacturing works buried deep within the mountains. I saw the same intensely burning-bright orange- gold craft test-flown above Northrop's mountaintop test bed there as I had seen above Areas 51/S-4 (11.). When energized these discs emit their characteristic intense glow. It is reasonable to assume that this is due to strong ionization, and that electrogravitics is the methodology of their field propulsion. 9) The XH-75D or XH Shark antigravity helicopter is manufactured by Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical Corporation of San Diego. Colonel Wilson reported that many of these XH-75Ds were assigned to the Delta/National Reconnaissance Organization Division which retrieves downed UFOs. That Division is also implicated in mutilating cattle as a psychological warfare program on the American public, to try to get citizens to fear and hate extraterrestrials through assuming that aliens are the ones cutting up the cattle. Colonel Wilson also leaked a drawing of the XH-75D Shark. (See: 10) The TAW-50 is a hypersonic, antigravity space fighter-bomber. A defense contractor with whom I have been in communication leaked to me details of this U.S. Advanced TAW-50 warcraft. Developed during the early 1990s, the capabilities of this war-bird are jaw-dropping. And the technology shows that the Defense Department did not fail to utilize what it learned combing through the wreckage of various UFO crashes. The TAW-50 was jointly developed by the Lockheed-Martin Skunk Works (Palmdale-Helendale, CA) and Northrop (undoubtedly at their undeclared Anthill facility within the Tehachapi Mountains, northwest of Lancaster, CA.) Both companies have a history of development of secret anti-gravity craft at these Mojave Desert facilities. The TAW-50 has speed capabilities well in excess of Mach 50, a number the contractor calls a very conservative estimate. Its actual speed is classified. Since Mach-1 is 1,225 kilometers per hour, (approximately 748 mph), this means that the TAW-50 is capable of moving considerably faster than 38,000 mph. In comparison, the velocity required to escape Earth's gravity is 25,000 mph. Therefore the TAW-50 isa capable of going into space, and does. The TAW-50 has a SCRAM (supersonic ramjet) propulsion system for passing through the outer atmosphere. The TAW-50 utilizes electrogravitics to maintain its own artificial gravity while in weightless space, as well as to nullify the vehicle's mass during operations. The TAW-50's power supply is provided by a small nuclear power generator that the contractor said is Normal-Inert . The contractor said that the space plane uses electromagnetoferrometric power generation by the immersion of pellets in heavy water (deuterium) and specially-designed coil superconductive magnets, which yield enormous amounts of free electrons when placed in an immersion which has been triggered into an oscillating field-state flux. The TAW-50 has a crew of four. Nevertheless, the TAW-50 flies so fast that it requires computers to fly it. These were developed by American Computer Company, who derived them from its Valkyrie XB/9000 AI [artificial intelligence] Guidance series. They utilize a RISC Milspec Superchip. There are 180 of them in the flight control system, and 64 more in the weapons guidance system, the contractor reported. It can carry a combined payload of glide bombs and a package of MIRV (Multiple Independently-targeted Reentry Vehicles), mil-speak for a group of intercontinental ballistic missiles, each of which can seek out and strike a different target. The MIRV pack also contains reentry-capable balloon countermeasures to make it very difficult for laser and other defensive weapons to track down where the real MIRVs are and intercept them. The TAW-50 is armed with its own Kill Laser system, which can track and immolate SAM (Surface-to-Air missiles), STTA (Surface-To-Trans- Atmosphere missiles), ATA (Air-To- Air missiles), and ATTA (Air-To- Trans-Atmospheric missiles). The TAW-50's killer lasers can also knock down high-performance fighter interceptors. The TAW's Kill Laser is much smaller than the earlier 1980s-era SDI (Star Wars program) models, and has a miniaturized cooling core and 500 times the wattage. The contractor said it uses a spontaneous nucleonic burst to trigger the lasing [laser] effect. In addition, the TAW-50 is armed with microsuperexplosive HyperDart missiles. These are just a little larger than ordinary aircraft cannon ammunition, but travel at hypersonic speed for up to three minutes, and have enormous explosive capability. One HyperDart can blow apart a MiG fighter anywhere within 20 feet of the HyperDart. The TAW-50 carries several hundred HyperDarts. Because the TAW-50 is designed to operate in space, it has on board a two-day air supply. This air supply can be extended by using its scoop system and traveling into the upper atmosphere to harvest more oxygen. The contractor did not reveal the size of the space fighter-bomber except to say, It's a pretty big thing. The performance of the TAW-50 makes it virtually impossible to defend against. It can hide in orbit many hundreds of miles into space, orbiting at times at 22,000 mph. Then, without warning, it can dive straight down through the atmosphere at over 38,000 miles per hour on an 80-degree attack vector, reverse direction within 150 feet of the ground with very little loss of motion and without a glide turn, and almost instantly go vertically straight up at over 38,000 mph until long after it leaves the atmosphere and resumes orbiting in space. The contractor noted, Those [electro-]gravitics allow it to change its mass to almost nothing in a moment, and reverse direction in a second, increase its acceleration to so many times G [Earth's gravity] it's not funny, yet they are able to nearly nullify the G-force on the pilots. They [the electrogravitics] are fourth-generation, with the ability to bring it to a complete standstill in under 2 milliseconds, if need be, without crushing the pilots, and keep it there for quite some time. The contractor notes, It's far too fast for tracking radars. And, he adds, What military aims its radars straight up? The TAW-50 can be refueled and rearmed in orbit by docking with the secret undeclared Military Space Station that is in orbit (12) The entire refueling and rearming procedure takes under 10 minutes. Who mans the gas pumps? Military astronauts trained at the Secret Air Force Academy, located in the hills west of the official Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs, CO. These military astronauts rotate duty by traveling to and from Vandenberg Air Force Base on other military antigravity vehicles (13.). Xplanes The Cape Canaveral Space Shuttles have carried the arming platforms ( classified Defense Department payloads ) up to the secret Military Space Station. The contractor reported that with a few extra tanks of LOX (liquid oxygen), the TAW-50 could fly to the Moon and back. As of 2002, the U.S. has 20 TAW-50s in its arsenal. But, as the contractor commented, you could take out an entire nation in under 10 days with only 10 of these, doing three attacks a day. One can wipe out an entire city the size of suburban Cleveland in a single attack without having to use any nukes at all. The electrogravitics for the TAW-50 was produced by GE Radionics. Pratt & Whitney designed the SCRAM atmospheric penetrator technology. American Computing Company created the artificial- intelligence supercomputers. The contractor said he could not tell me anything else. And it was clear he did not want his name used. So, this is what is known. 11?) Are the above the current state-of-the-art in advanced aerospace craft? No. There have been advances beyond "mere" antigravity field propulsion. Quantum particulate physics is now being used to update a variety of aerospace craft and their weapons systems. On a recent (09/16/05) field trip to the boundary of Area 51, during a middle-of-the-night observation, I saw first one, then another, and finally six brightly-lit objects suddenly appear at approximately 1000' (305 meters) height above the desert floor. The intensely-glowing ruddy golden-orangish ionization field surrounding these craft appeared identical to the field around the Northrop antigravity disc. But in the 13 years since I had last observed the Northrop discs above Area 51, and at their Tehachapi Mountains manufacturing site, considerable progress has been made. In 1992, the Northrop disc slowly rose vertically from its flight pad and gradually reached flight altitude. But in 2005 these craft are able to depart from their flight pad and suddenly appear at flight altitude without any visible ascent. And it is not a matter of their ionization field having been turned off during ascent for stealth purposes. The ionization field comes with electrogravitic field propulsion. If the ionization were turned off, the craft would fall from the sky. Rather what appears to be going on is that the Northrop engineers have incorporated quantum physics principles into the propulsion. Simply stated, Northrop appears to have harnessed quantum entanglement to achieve quantum teleportation. To the observer the craft simply ceases to exist on the flight pad and instantly begins to exist at, in this case, 1000 feet altitude. If the interpretation of this observation is correct, then there exists an 11th entry in the U.S. "antigravity" arsenal, the Northrop Quantum Teleportation Disc. If the black-budget scientists keep advancing along these lines, we could foresee the day when a fleet of Air Force craft suddenly "cease to exist" on the air base runway and instantly appear at 35,000 feet altitude over a target city halfway around the globe. America has used its enormous wealth to become the global super- power. The TAW-50 is but one example of its exotic, unnecessarily proliferative, and highly-destructive arsenal. The world awaits the day when America finds its soul, and pays more attention to matters of spirit, mind and metaphysical development, and withdraws from its addiction to war toys. It has been said that if the American people knew what the military had in their arsenal today, they wouldn't believe it, and would think that someone was fantasizing about a George Lucas Star Wars movie episode. But it's not science-fiction. The future is already here. Footnotes 1. See: http://www.boblazar.com/closed/reactor.htm 2. UFOs and Area 51, Vol. 2 - The Bob Lazar Video (1999), available via Amazon on-line bookstore at: www.Amazon.com 3. Personal communication, September 20, 1997. 4. See: http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html 5. See: http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html 6. Personal communication, September 20, 1997. 7. See: http://www.drboylan.com/swilson2.html 8. Personal communication, February 10, 2002. 9. See: http://www.drboylan.com/basespst2.html 10. See: http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/bt3r.htm 11. See: http://www.drboylan.com/grantour2.html 12. See: http://www.drboylan.com/basespst2.htm 13. See: http://www.drboylan.com/colww3a.html 14. See: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-entangle <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Author information: Richard Boylan, Ph.D. is an internationally-noted rsearcher of UFOs and Star Visitors and of transformed human Star Kids and Star Seed adults. He is a behavioral scientist, exo-anthropologist, emeritus university Associate Professor of Psychology, Registered Social Worker, Certified Clinical Hypnotherapist, and Councillor. He is President of the Star Kids Project, Ltd., a nonprofit educational organization. He is author of four books, the latest, Star Kids: the Emerging Cosmic Generation (2005). Author contact information: Richard Boylan, Ph.D. P.O. Box 22310, Sacramento, CA 95822 , USA E-mail: drboylan@sbcglobal.net (916) 422-7400 Website: www.drboylan.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Friends ad Star Kids, Friday I sent out my article on "Classified Advanced Antigravity Aerospace Craft Utilizing Back-engineered Extraterrestrial Technology". I sent it out without introduction by directly posting it to my three Groups without sending it there by email as i usually do. I did so in the hope of getting it out to you before the Cabal self-appointed censors could intercept it, as they did last time when they took that opportunity to also destroy my computer. It is clear now that the article has made it to all three Groups, and that therefore the Cabal cannot contain this information any longer. So I am sending this follow-on message to you. The implications of the advanced antigravity craft back-engineered by humans are several. All of the antigravity technology is in the control of the organization conducting the UFO Cover-Up. This organization is so heavily infiltrated by Cabal types that Dr. Michael Wolf regretfully concluded that the Cabal had effective control of it. He should know; he was a high member of that Special Studies Group, [formerly "MJ-12"], buried wthin the National Security Council. Since the Cabal effectively control the development and special uses of these craft, there remains a very high danger that the Cabal will use its growing antigravity fleet to try to repel the Star Visitors and even conduct Space War. Elements within the U.S. Air Force and the Naval Space Command are making preparations for such a Space War. What can we do about this as lightworkers, Star Kids, Star Seed adults or other humans of good will? First is to keep ourselves informed about dangerous and evil uses of antigravity (and quantum) technology. Second is to contact our political representatives to oppose policies and weapons systems development that is oriented towards space warfare. Third is to encourage the release of this technology into the civilian sector, where it can revolutionize transportation, energy generation, large construction projects, and other peaceful uses. Fourth, the existence of this human technology is a two-edged sword for the Cabal. Not only is the existence of antigravity technology starting to get out to the public, but also the very existence of a massive worldwide organization conducting the UFO Cover-Up and confiscation of Star Visitor technology. As the public becomes aware that the Cabal have unfairly monopolized this technology for 40+ years, the public will become incensed at the Cabal for their greed and selfishness. This then becomes the opportunity to expose and discredit the Cabal, the Number One obstacle to human safety and progress. in the light, Richard Boylan, Ph.D. Richard Boylan, Ph.D., LLC Behavioral scientist, educator, researcher President, Star Kids Project, LTD P.O. Box 22310 Sacramento, CA 95822, USA Email: drboylan@sbcglobal.net www.drboylan.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Defense contractor's anti-gravity discovery disclosed [Truth_about_Wunderwaffe_95x95.jpg] A fabled top secret World War II technology, never fully developed by the Nazis, although many individuals were allegedly killed in the process of its testing, apparently has been replicated in part by a mainstream Californian defense contractor, SARA, showing anti-gravity and propulsion effects. Part I -- Introduction by Sterling D. Allan Pure Energy Systems News, Exclusive Interview Copyright © 2005 Lifter, by Tim Ventura Tim Ventura's "lifter" Source: Wired and AmericanAntigravity.com "SARA performs cutting-edge, multi-disciplinary technology development in areas with high potential -- both in scientific achievement and market impact -- and transforms the developed technologies into successful products and services for clients in business, industry, and government. SARA's headquarters, engineering, lab and production operations are in Cypress, California -- just south of Los Angeles. SARA also has engineering, lab and field test offices in Albuquerque, New Mexico and a program office in Washington. Tim Ventura has been running AmericanAntigravity.com for three and a half years, and has approached the site and its subject with a passion of a dedicated activist. He has posted video clips and given numerous demonstrations of the gravity-defying "lifters" he has built. He's been interviewed on several major U.S. radio talk shows, has had numerous articles written about him, and has been featured on television networks, most recently having done a segment that is slated to appear on the Discovery channel. With that background, we take notice when he points to something as being "the most significant development" in the field. With a preface to that effect, he recently announced that John Dering of SARA and members of that team have replicated key elements of the fabled Nazi Bell technology, and have seen some anti-gravity and propulsion effects with it. Not only does their replication have ramifications for anti-gravity and propulsion, but it could also hold a key to the development of new energy technologies. The technology depends on and fills in some missing pieces in Einstein's Unified Field Theory. Ventura paraphrases Dering as saying, "Quantum mechanics might not explain this, but Einstein's [Unified Field Theory] does, as shown by Gabriel Kron." As the former Chief Scientist for GE, Kron's work is the lynchpin to understanding these things, according to Ventura. Though this sounds fantastic and unbelievable, we have to take note that SARA is not a "fringe science" group. They carry out contracts for major companies such as Boeing and Lockheed. Founded in the '80s, Scientific Applications & Research Associates are a split-off from U.S. military-aerospace research and development, and they have multiple facilities and numerous engineers in their independent company. Take a look at their website, and you will see that they are a substantial outfit that is taken seriously by the mainstream of science and technology. (Ref) On the other hand, also remarkable is the fact that SARA is not boasting about this discovery. They have been holding this card very tight to their chest. Ventura thinks this is the most exciting thing going, and has been tracking it for over a year, accumulating what he guesses to be around 650 emails with the company on the subject. Dering "laid out the physics in great detail" to Ventura. How did Dering get involved? "The Nazi-Bell device consisted two of counter-rotating cylindrical containers. The containers, which were positioned one above the other measured approximately 1-meter in diameter, and were filled with cryogenically cooled and frozen Mercury metal. There was a frozen core of a metallic paste, which served as a "high permeability material" for the EMG (electromagnetic-gravitational) field." -- Nick Cook, Hunt for Zero Point Ventura said that Dering once related a story about noticing an unexplained anti-gravity phenomenon when called out to trouble-shoot a situation in which mercury was splashing to the top of a chamber under certain conditions. When he saw the same thing in two additional, independent, unintended cases, to him that counted as a scientifically-reproduced effect. He began to read the work of Gabriel Kron, and studied the Nazi Bell research, finding in their work some plausible explanations for what he had observed. Those pioneers laid the groundwork upon which Dering set forth intentionally to replicate the effect. When he and his team were able to accomplish this, it showed that the mercury had not been splashing. It had been levitating. Dering's scaled-down replication hasn't killed anyone, but it has reportedly "made people nauseous," said Ventura. Sitting on it What is maddening to Ventura is that they have such a profound development, and it is going nowhere. For example, Ventura brokered a phone call from a government interest [obscured per Ventura's request] to SARA in order to get some funding rolling, but SARA declined to give the information requested in the screening call. Ventura laments that all SARA needs is a million dollars or so to go to the next step with their research on this. To him, "it seems as though they are treating this like just another one of their many projects. Until they get funding for it, they will not go forward with it." Yet the many attempts Ventura has made to facilitate funding for this have met with frustration every time. Ventura even recently incorporated American Antigravity as a 501(c)3 non-profit in hopes of raising the necessary funds for this research. In addition to the frustration of seeing the technology stalled, Ventura has resented being told not to talk about it publicly. "I didn't start AAG just to sit on it," he said. Being the promotional person that he is, keeping quiet really violates his nature. "I was surprised and dismayed to find that SARA had no interest in publicizing what could be the greatest technological breakthrough in the history of mankind. John was more than happy to assist me with writing an article about the Nazi-Bell. But then he censored my attempt to disclose the fact that a successful replication had been conducted. Creating a gravitational back-EMF effect that they were unable to shield is particularly relevant given SARA's role in doing EMF-shielding for the B-2 Bomber." [Tim_Ventura_with_stator.jpg] Tim Ventura, as shown in a slideshow at Rense.com His present project is developing a small-scale replication of the radar invisibility effect. Last January, Ventura wrote a story about the development, but when he passed it by Dering, he was told to take out any mention that SARA had this technology. After these many more months of going the rounds with them, he got to a point that seems like an impasse: a technology that Ventura thinks should be front-and-center in science as one of the key answers to some of the most pressing technological issues facing mankind is essentially mothballed. This week Ventura composed a document that provides a closer look at what is going on, and divulges ^Ö against SARA's earlier wishes ^Ö the fact that SARA has this technology and is doing nothing with it. Though he hopes he hasn^Òt burned his bridges in so doing, he said that considering what is at stake on this planet, his ethics as a human being are driving him to risk his relationship with SARA "in order to at least educate the public about this compelling research." One is reminded of Taiwan, which recently bucked a patent after negotiations with the patent holder were stalemated, in order to proceed in the development of a vaccine because they believed it to be capable of saving many lives. (Ref.) >>>>> SOURCE <<< ________________________________________________________________________________ ESA Announces Gravity-Modification Breakthrough ESA Announces Gravity-Modification Breakthrough By Tim Ventura Tim Ventura The Linus Torvalds of Antigravity ... Since the birth of American Antigravity in 2002, Tim has been featured on a multitude of television networks, such as Nippon TV and the BBC, as well as extensively covered in print by sources as diverse as Wired Magazine and Jane's Defense Weekly. View all articles by Tim Ventura Gravitomagnetic London Effect Found in Rotating Superconductors This week the European Space Agency announced the results of an experimental test in which a superconductor rotating at 6,500 rpm is shown to gain acceleration as the result of what is believed to be a gravity-modification effect. As reported by the ESA, "The experiment demonstrated that a superconductive gyroscope is capable of generating a powerful gravitomagnetic field, and is therefore the gravitational counterpart of the magnetic coil. Although just 100 millionths of the acceleration due to the Earth^Òs gravitational field, the measured field is a surprising one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein^Òs General Relativity predicts." The results were presented March 21st at the ESA's European Space and Technology Research Centre (ESTEC), in a paper entitled "Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment". The paper predicts the presence of a large gravitomagnetic field within a rotating superconductor, and describes the experimental detection of this phenomenon as an gravitational acceleration on the superconductor on the order of 100 µg. The experiment was performed by Dr's Martin Tajmar & Clovis De Matos at ARC Seibersdorf, Austria's largest independent research laboratory. Tajmar, the Head of Field Space Propulsion Business for ARC, was quoted as stating that these results, while preliminary, were nonetheless rigorously reviewed before publication, "We ran more than 250 experiments, improved the facility over 3 years and discussed the validity of the results for 8 months before making this announcement. Now we are confident about the measurement." Dr. Tajmar previously commented on this continuing research study during a video-interview with American Antigravity at STAIF 2006. While the announcement of these initial test-results is highly promising, Tajmar suggested that more experimentation is required before the results can be considered fully conclusive. In a statement Saturday, Tajmar remarked, "Of course, this effect needs further confirmation with other sensors, setups, etc. As an experimentalist, it is always very hard to release such data knowing that the claims are extraordinary, so I really want to be very cautious." Tajmar's experimental results follow in a long thread of anecdotal claims & theoretical predictions from scientists such as Dr's Ning Li, Evgeny Podkletnov, Douglas Torr, Robert Baker, Raymond Chiao, and David Maker. While Li & Podletnov have described seeing remarkable large-scale experimental results, other experiments have produced no results whatsoever, creating a general uncertainty in the scientific community as to whether gravitomagnetic effects do in fact exist in superconductors. Dr. Clive Woods of Iowa State University addressed the issue of gravitational-coupling in superconductors in a recent publication entitled "High-Frequency Gravitational Wave Optics". His research revisits earlier calculations by Li & Torr showing that gravitational waves inside a Type-II superconductor propogate with a phase-velocity 300 times slower than in free-space, and leading to the hypothesis that a superconductor may require focusing in order to correctly absorb & re-radiate gravitational waves. This notion may explain in part at least some of the difficulty found in obtaining consistent experimental results, as illustrated by the experimental failure of Dr. Raymond Chiao's "gravity-radio" experiment in 2003. While Woods^Ò publication certainly seems to provide new insight into manipulating gravitational force using superconductors, Tajmar believes that Woods^Ò research is not applicable to this latest experiment, "As you have probably seen in the experimental paper, we found the effect in Nb and Pb (Type-II and Type-I) - so it's not specifically related to Type-I or II superconductors. Moreover, Clive based his focusing requirements on the speed of gravity equation from an old Li & Torr paper - after calculating through her paper, I believe that this specific equation is not correct." Another startling aspect of Tajmar's reported experimental results is the scale, which demonstrates a coupling many orders of magnitude higher than both Relativity Theory and earlier research into High-Frequency Gravity-Waves (HFGW's) would predict. HFGW researcher & STAIF Session-Chairperson Gary Stephenson commented on this by noting that the difference in scale of the reported effects may be the result of Tajmar's experimental implimentation, which he described as a "DC static gravitomagnetic field, potentially bound by different coupling efficiencies than those predicted by the wavelike AC-nature of traditional High-Frequency Gravitational Waves." If the gravitomagnetic coupling coefficient is in fact higher for rotating-superconductors than for HFGW experiments, it could mean new life for the experimental research of Dr. Evgeny Podkletnov, best-known for a highly-publicized 1996 claim to have created a 2% decrease in the weight of a YBCO Type-II superconductor rotating at 5,000 rpm. Podkletnov has since then also described creating a powerful "force-beam" apparatus by passing a high-energy electrical discharge from a Marx-Generator through a superconducting spark-gap during experimentation at the Moscow Chemical Research Institute in Russia. Gary Stephenson commented in the similarity between the 1996 experiments and Tajmar's results, stating, "Tajmar's experiment seems highly analogous to Podkletnov's experiment, but based on a firmer theoretical foundation. In essence, they are spinning a superconductor, which is exactly what Podkletnov claimed produced an identical -- albeit larger-- result." STAIF Conference Section-F Chairman Paul Murad made a more direct comparison, stating, "Is this truly the first time that we've seen this effect, or has it perhaps already been documented under different manifestations? Is this the same as Podkletnov's gravity-shielding effect? I can't help but wonder if these results have been seen in the past in other experiments, and perhaps were either not reported or instead attributed to other causal factors..." With Tajmar's recent publication raising more questions than answers, there seems to be only one point of clear consensus -- the need for additional research. Paul Murad summarized the views of many with the statement, "For the moment, I'm taking a wait and see attitude to see how this research further develops. We also have to see the experimental setup, possible environmental & terrestrial sources of error, and a variety of successful experimental replications before making a determination. We need to see this reproduced by others before making a final decision." ________________________________________________________________________________ Links: ESA: Towards a New Test of General Relativity?, Martin Tajmar Homepage, Wired: Breaking The Law of Gravity, Chiao's Gravity-Radio Interviews: Martin Tajmar Video Interview (STAIF 2006), Eugene Podkletnov Audio Interview #1, Eugene Podkletnov Audio Interview #2 Publications: Experimental Detection of the Gravitomagnetic London Moment, Local Photon and Graviton Mass and its Consequences Related: High-Frequency Gravitational-Wave Optics, Weak gravitational shielding properties of superconductors, Investigation of HV discharges through large ceramic superconducting electrodes, Superconductor Impulse Gravity Generator Thoughts on Antigravity Part 1 From Robert Becker to Jack Sarfatti I will try to respond briefly. In the interests of objectivity, it should be noted that since I was part of some of the goings on in this field, some of my observations and conclusions may naturally be biased. I have also been out of the mainstream of this area for quite some time and do not know all the developments and am in know way an expert on SC. First, if confirmed - and I completely agree with Paul Murad and even the experimenters themselves - that this needs to be reconfirmed many times, it is truly a spectacular, historic result. de Matos and Tajmar deserve immense credit for even obtaining the funding for such an experiment over such a time period, and being able to carry it out. At the least, it should open up the theoretical floodgates and revive interest in Li-Torr, Becker, Ross, Baker, Robertson and NASA, Chiao, etc. approaches. Much criticisim has been lavished upon Li, the NASA group, and Podkletnov for not having performed "perfect" experiments. One reason for that is lack of funding. It is the infamous Catch-22. To do a "perfect" experiment usually requires good funding for the time and equipment necessary. But to get it, one requires already the perfect experiment. On the theoretical front, I agree with the Tajmar statement that this experiment appears to have little to do with Li-Torr Theory. The Woods Paper is very interesting and useful, but what he did is examine the implications for HFGW if Li-Torr Theory was correct. It did not completely or so much directly address the validity of Li-Torr Theory; he did argue that it could not be dismissed cavalierly on the basis of the some of the earlier critiques. (The underlying basis for the Li-Torr Theory is often misunderstood, including by Tajmar in years past, and so critiques often address the wrong issues, or at least not the most fundamental issues.) I also agree that it appears to have little to do with the Podkletnov experiments directly. One advantage of, and a good decision by de Matos and Tajmar, was is to use simpler experimental systems. I think when studying unkown physics, the KISS principle really should apply!! They apparently did not use High-Tc SC for their experiment, unlike Podkletnov, who used a complicated double layered High-Tc SC system for one of them. (The original Li-Torr work was based on Low-Tc Type 1 SC.) Tony Robertson and Modanese have spent great effort investigating the details of the Podkletnov system, and Robertson attributes the possibility of this effect to such complexity in the linkage between the layers. I do not think his model is convincing yet, but the de Matos-Tajmar result should throw open the door for reconsideration. As to weight gain, here I disagree with Tajmar. Though the magnitude of such effects might have been incorrectly predicted by Li-Torr Theory, that there would be some kind of Newtonian gravititational effect produced due to an (AC) GM field being generated in the SC is a direct prediction of one of the later Li-Torr Papers and should not be controversial. That follows from the Einstein-Maxwell Equations of linearized GR. The magnitude of the effect is and is not surprising. As Jack showed below, this effect is huge, much larger than conventional GR would predict (e.g. in a Gravity Probe B-type experiment). Given the demonstration of the slowing of light in condensates over the last decade, Jack's derivation offers a very interesting phenomenological explanation for the effect, using a classical model of a rotating source and the slowing of the light speed. However, I think more may be at work here. I do not know the details of the de Matos-Tajmar Theory. But starting with my Thesis and in subsequent work culminating in the following Paper with de Matos: C. de Matos, R. E. Becker, arXiv: gr-qc/9908001, 1999, I argued that a relatively large GM flux effects in SC, in the presence of a magnetic field (which could in turn be generated by rotation), is required by QM in the form of GM Flux Quantization, regardless of how this could be generated and explained by the microphysics. I did not examine the same system that de Matos-Tajmar are apparently studying. Mine did not have rotation, and rotation should not be required for the effect I predicted so long as a sufficiently strong magnetic field is present. So, the two approached may not be directly comparable. (Certainly the experiment de Matos and I proposed is not the same as what he and Tajmar eventually performed.) I came up with the concept of Coherent ZPM for the express purpose of offereing a (very) qualitative concept for how such a larger GM field could be generated, whether in a SC or in a HeII superfluid, which is what my Thesis first looked at. (A superfluid should exhibit the same effect the SC when rotated, albeit much weaker.) It might also be used as an alternative to the underlying explanation in Li-Torr Theory. The magnitude of the effect I predicted and what may have been demonstrated here raises an important mathematical issue, which I discussed first in the Thesis and in the subsequent de Matos-Tajmar and Mitre Papers: If the GM field is really relatively huge, are the linearized Einstein-Maxwell equations, which are the usual starting point for discussions of GM effects in condensates, still valid in such a regime? That needs to be addressed with this experiment, as well as my own work


Leave a comment